Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / mediation / How to Think About Picking and Using a Mediator?

How to Think About Picking and Using a Mediator?

October 22, 2015 by Lester Levy 1 Comment

env adr -blindfoldThere are many facets to this question. There are hundreds of articles on the internet and in other publications which list important considerations like experience, competency, subject matter expertise, style, track record, cost, etc. These are all very important factors. No doubt.

I come at this question a little differently because many of the cases I work on are multi-faceted and involve an extensive cast of parties with divergent interests. In these cases, I think it’s important to step back and carefully consider what is impeding settlement. Is there a fundamental disagreement on valuation, or perhaps it has proven unusually difficult to communicate effectively with other parties, or else maybe there are client relationships interfering with the negotiations? It’s much easier for a third party mediator to objectively assess the dynamics of the dispute.

The more complicated and multi-faceted a legal dispute is, the more value there will be for the parties in taking the time to select the right mediator. Why do I say this? Very often, an experienced litigator will resist turning to a mediator because they think they can negotiate a settlement on their own. But I believe that even the best lawyers will prove to be overmatched when it comes to orchestrating settlement negotiations in complex, multi-party cases. In extremely complex cases, the substantive interests that separate the parties often prevent the lawyers from even establishing a framework for conducting effective settlement negotiations. And once negotiations start, overriding loyalty to one’s own client and personally held points of view can clash and interfere with pursuit of the course of action that is best suited to achieving a global resolution of the case.

In such situations a mediator or settlement master serves as lawyer for the settlement. As odd as it may sound, as I see it, a mediator’s client is the settlement itself. Yet all other rules of mediation remain in effect – absolute confidentiality, process planning and implementation, knowledge of the subject matter at issue, voluntariness of any result, timing of facilitative vs. evaluative discussion (in other words, when and if to deliver an confidential evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of a party’s case) and so on.

So when I hear lawyers say, if I can’t settle a case, no one can — and therefore mediation will not work – I disagree. Those are precisely the cases where mediation can work. It’s in the most complicated of disputes that a good mediator can end up providing the most significant value by serving as lawyer for the settlement.

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: mediation, Mediator's Role Tagged With: mediation

inter-generational-theft-Brexit-climate-change

The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change

In last week’s Brexit vote results, there was a tremendous divide between age groups. 73% of voters under the age of 25 voted to remain in the EU, while about 58% over the age of 45 voted to leave. This generational gap is among the many parallels … Read More...

drinking-water-regulation

Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass

WASHINGTON — Federal drinking water rules are so relaxed that not even the city of Flint, Michigan, has been cited for a violation, even though many Flint residents have been relying on bottled water for drinking and cooking since last year. The … Read More...

Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes

Some of you may already have seen a copy of my new ebook, in which I propose a new paradigm for resolving complex, multi-party environmental disputes. It relies on mediation -- not as it has been compromised and incorporated into standard litigation … Read More...

Comments

  1. Kim deck says

    November 23, 2015 at 10:20 am

    Hi Lester:

    What a great site! Congratulations and thank you for sharing!
    Kim

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

Tags

ADR agriculture alternative dispute resolution Apple Apple phones big data Bio diversity Brexit class actions climate change contamination data data analysis eco-friendly environment environmental clean up environmental disputes environmental mediation environmental technology EPA farmed fish Flint global water challenge green living infrastructure legal strategy litigation alternative mediation mediation process mediation vs. litigation nature negotation New Jersey pollution oceans protected areas recycling renewable energy role of mediator settlement sustainability technology toxic tort water water contamintation water summit

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial