Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Case Studies / Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict

Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict

environmental mediation case study 5This study describes how repeated and intensive mediated conversations can repair years of misunderstanding and create a trustful open relationship moving forward.

I was retained to mediate between a major university, the town and county in which it was located and interested citizens over a disputed long range development plan for the university. The issues touched on housing capacity, increased traffic and water usage – serious quality of life issues — over the next 20 years. A big deal to all concerned.

The parties didn’t agree to mediate. A court strongly suggested it, so they complied. When I first met with each party individually, each one said in no uncertain terms that the case could never settle.   There was universal pessimism. In fact, the mediation followed an unsuccessful negotiation where one side actually just walked out of the door.

The first step was to try to separate the present from the past. To attempt to dispel misconceptions and start to build trust by examining the history of dealings, the impediments to settlement, the views and misconceptions about other parties, the conditions for successful negotiation, and a settlement structure and content. We began to map out zone of potential agreement.

In so doing each interest committed to the following course of action in the mediation:

  • “To use their professional, political and personal capital to support and advocate for a resolution they feel is best for the community and the university (and better than the alternative of no agreement and further litigation)?’
  • “To dedicate the time and effort needed for intensive negotiations?” and
  • “To work towards a durable, cooperative partnership — in the form of a binding commitment — to resolve the current set of problems (and agree on a process to resolve future disputes)?”

In subsequent mediation sessions an agreement began to take shape. Separate meetings with appropriate personnel were held on the main issues of water, housing and traffic. Written offers and counteroffers were exchanged before each meeting. And everyone had an equal seat at the table. So all persons, whether university chancellor, elected official or a resident of the town had equal status and was treated with dignity and respect.

More than five years later, the agreement is still in effect.

  • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
  • Case Study 2: Working Together
  • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
  • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
  • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial