Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / The Basics of Environmental Mediation / The Mediation Outcome

The Mediation Outcome

MEDIATION OUTCOMES: Binding Agreements Crafted to Address the Questions Presented by Each Case

Inherent in mediated outcomes is a lot of useful and practical flexibility. Every legal issue presented to a judge or jury can be resolved through mediation – with several important differences. First the parties agree among themselves how that issue resolves, rather than leaving the answer to a third party. In so doing they keep control over the result rather than leaving themselves open to a much less favorable outcome chosen by someone else. Or the parties can agree to a method for resolution that derives from the core of the dispute, such as scientific differences or actual costs and effectiveness of future cleanup results. In contrast, court outcomes tend to be much more austere and lacking in refinement due to mandatory adherence to procedural and evidentiary rules.

A mediated outcome also provides the opportunity to weave together and settle at one time many interrelated disputes that may arise from a single event or contaminated area. For example, one environmental situation may involve civil suits among the private parties seeking an allocation of fault and payment for the cleanup, enforcement or penalty actions brought by environmental regulatory agencies and attorneys’ general, and lawsuits between individual parties and insurance companies that issued multiple pollution policies over the years. The outcome of each of these cases may affect the ability of the parties to resolve the other cases. But no one court or administrative body ordinarily has jurisdiction over all these cases. Mediation, however, provides a single forum where all these cases can be resolved in a coordinated way. It may be achieved through separate agreements but the effect is the same – all moving pieces are brought to rest at a point that meets the interests of all involved.

Optimally, agreement(s) reached at the conclusion of the mediation are binding written contracts that resolve all disputes over past costs and future obligations arising from the contamination at issue. These are voluntary agreements fully informed by a clear understanding about the extent and costs of cleaning up all contamination, anticipating future events, as much as possible. In addition, many mediated environmental agreements include ancillary accords, which resolve party-specific disputes over insurance coverage, which further promote comprehensive settlements.  These agreements often are based upon regulatorypre-approval of work that will result in a “no further action” if successfully completed as anticipated by the parties. The settling parties also receive broad contractual releases and contribution protection, including judicially sanctioned good faith settlement bars, against future liability.

  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
  • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
  • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
  • The Environmental Mediation Process
  • Insurance Company Involvement
  • The Mediation Outcome
Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial