Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / mediation / Learning To Make The Most Of Imperfect Evidence

Learning To Make The Most Of Imperfect Evidence

May 20, 2016 by Lester Levy Leave a Comment

making-the-most-of-imperfect-evidenceCall it “rough justice” if you prefer.  This is yet another reason why many lawsuits are well suited to the mediation process.  In environmental cases, for example, we cannot “rewind the tape” to see exactly when and how much of a particular contaminant was released into the environment, and by whom.  Similarly, we cannot perfectly dissect the subsurface beneath our feet (like cutting a slice of birthday cake) and see the precise soil and groundwater pathways that a chemical release traveled over the course of months and years, vertically and horizontally.  The best we can do is to drill for samples at various locations and depths where we expect the contamination to be found, to study the resulting evidence of the subsurface contours and the chemical concentrations found at each location.  From this data we “reconstruct” what we believe most likely happened many months and years ago, where the chemicals were released and where they are now located, how we can most efficiently and cost effectively clean them up, and what will happen to the affected media if the problem is not corrected.

We cannot go back in time. Therefore, we must draw informed yet imperfect inferences from all the evidence we can find.

This is where environmental mediation comes in.  With this data in hand, as evaluated by experienced professionals working for the disputants, we can vet the various studies presented though informed and professional debate.  From these studies, peer review and discussion, we draw rational inferences from which we can answer the key legal and scientific questions presented, including: where is the contamination found and in what concentrations, what methods are available to clean it up it to required levels, at what cost and, ultimately, who should bear the costs and in what proportion. 

This often is a more effective way to resolve disputes – by working to reach a professional consensus among lawyers and consultants on the most likely causes and fixes to the problems at hand.  Over the last 30 years or more, through collective effort we have developed a stunning amount of knowledge about subsurface environmental pathways and the properties of the chemicals at issue as they travel in those pathways.  We also have a much clearer understanding of the best available methods for remediating particular types of contamination.  Equipped with this knowledge and experience, we are able to make important judgments and negotiate voluntary agreements that more efficiently accomplish what needs to be done and meets the needs of our clients and the public at large.   

The imperfect evidence we obtain can, of course, provide the fodder for countless motions and countermotions as the parties try to litigate their way towards an upper hand.  Or the same imperfect evidence can be studied and used by the parties, with the help of advisors, to shape a settlement through mediation.  Ultimately, the voluntary agreements we reach can also serve to protect our clients against the evidentiary uncertainty by protecting them against future risks.    

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: mediation Tagged With: environmental disputes, environmental mediation, litigation alternative, settlement

inter-generational-theft-Brexit-climate-change

The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change

In last week’s Brexit vote results, there was a tremendous divide between age groups. 73% of voters under the age of 25 voted to remain in the EU, while about 58% over the age of 45 voted to leave. This generational gap is among the many parallels … Read More...

drinking-water-regulation

Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass

WASHINGTON — Federal drinking water rules are so relaxed that not even the city of Flint, Michigan, has been cited for a violation, even though many Flint residents have been relying on bottled water for drinking and cooking since last year. The … Read More...

Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes

Some of you may already have seen a copy of my new ebook, in which I propose a new paradigm for resolving complex, multi-party environmental disputes. It relies on mediation -- not as it has been compromised and incorporated into standard litigation … Read More...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

Tags

ADR agriculture alternative dispute resolution Apple Apple phones big data Bio diversity Brexit class actions climate change contamination data data analysis eco-friendly environment environmental clean up environmental disputes environmental mediation environmental technology EPA farmed fish Flint global water challenge green living infrastructure legal strategy litigation alternative mediation mediation process mediation vs. litigation nature negotation New Jersey pollution oceans protected areas recycling renewable energy role of mediator settlement sustainability technology toxic tort water water contamintation water summit

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial