Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Mediation vs. Litigation / A Crisis in New Jersey with Underground Storage Tanks

A Crisis in New Jersey with Underground Storage Tanks

December 16, 2015 by Lester Levy 1 Comment

underground storage tanksNew Jersey Public Television (NJTV) recently completed a broadcast of a three-part expose on the dangers and difficulties stemming from as many as 100,000 underground storage tanks that remain in the ground throughout the state.  In very stark terms the NJTV report warns that some of the sites are “nightmares” and “environmental ticking time bombs”, posing an immediate threat of contamination from seepage into ground water and basements in heavily populated areas.

These old storage tanks, both above and underground, are from homes, gas stations and dry cleaning sites – closed or currently in operation – where the chemicals have leaked over time.  The chemicals include fuel, PCP (dry cleaning fluid) or VOCs like degreasers and other chemicals used in automotive or other manufacturing sites.  As storage tanks are prone to corrosion, some of the chemicals have leaked into the soils and then leached into the groundwater.  This is true of almost every tank that was built or installed more than ten to fifteen years ago, when the technology was changed to build tanks with several layers of protection.  Often neighboring businesses’ tanks release chemicals into the soil which then leaches into the groundwater and combine to form “plumes” of contamination in the ground water, which flow with the groundwater in underground channels to other properties.  One of the main concerns is that these plumes of contamination can reach areas where drinking water wells draw water from the contaminated groundwater or where the chemicals in the plume “off gas” as vapor upwards through the soil into buildings and homes.  These scenarios present very real risks to human health and welfare.

All expletives aside, the problems and risks stemming from these buried and abandoned underground storage tanks perfectly illustrate the reason we need a new approach to solve long-standing environmental cleanup problems.  As the NJTV reporters observed, the NJ Department of Environmental Protection is simply overwhelmed by the magnitude of the problem.  Given budget limitations and the protracted legal process involved when regulators move to compel cleanup, the NJ DEP has essentially been performing radical triage, focusing its resources on the situations needing immediate attention, which likely will result in the vast majority of these storage tanks remaining in the ground – and the contamination remaining in the groundwater — for many years to come.

What can be done to protect New Jersey residents from the very real threats of contamination?  Is there any way to push for quicker resolution and allocation of responsibility for cleanup costs?

Throughout my career I have specialized in developing strategies and techniques for using mediation in order to streamline the resolution of environmental cleanup disputes.   I have been doing this work for more than 20 years with overwhelming success.  By establishing the right cooperative framework, mediation can resolve these disputes far faster and at lower cost than traditional litigation.   Mediation, rather than typical litigation, provides a more intelligent, cheaper and focused way to oversee the negotiation among the parties regarding:  the collection and review of investigative data which show where and how much contamination exists, vetting various cleanup methodologies and choosing the most cost-efficient, effective and fastest remedy, as well as determining a fair allocation of the cleanup costs, based, not on conjecture, but real and guaranteed costs of the necessary cleanup work.

What the NJTV reports makes clear is that business as usual will not solve this problem, at least not within the lifespan of New Jersey residents.  We need a new approach that will expedite investigation, remediation and cleanup.  It’s time for New Jersey’s elected leaders to find the political will and courage to tackle this problem by establishing a framework, which includes proper incentives, in order to bring the necessary parties to the table.  And it’s further necessary for there to be a change in attitude among the environmental agencies charged with oversight and the courts that oversee litigated disputes.   It’s time to push for early mediation instead of continuing administrative delay or extended court based litigation which will only serve maintain the status quo.

Once the parties are brought to the table, we know how to do the rest.  Environmental mediation can get this vital job done where traditional approaches have failed us by leaving the tanks and contamination in place for far too long.

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: Mediation vs. Litigation Tagged With: contamination, environmental mediation, New Jersey pollution, NJTV, waste storage tanks

inter-generational-theft-Brexit-climate-change

The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change

In last week’s Brexit vote results, there was a tremendous divide between age groups. 73% of voters under the age of 25 voted to remain in the EU, while about 58% over the age of 45 voted to leave. This generational gap is among the many parallels … Read More...

drinking-water-regulation

Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass

WASHINGTON — Federal drinking water rules are so relaxed that not even the city of Flint, Michigan, has been cited for a violation, even though many Flint residents have been relying on bottled water for drinking and cooking since last year. The … Read More...

Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes

Some of you may already have seen a copy of my new ebook, in which I propose a new paradigm for resolving complex, multi-party environmental disputes. It relies on mediation -- not as it has been compromised and incorporated into standard litigation … Read More...

Trackbacks

  1. How Mediation Can Accelerate Environmental Cleanup - Environmental ADR says:
    January 12, 2016 at 11:30 am

    […] hazardous materials which threaten the groundwater we drink and use to irrigate our crops.  Click here to read more about this story.  Many of these leaking tanks have remained in place for decades […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

Tags

ADR agriculture alternative dispute resolution Apple Apple phones big data Bio diversity Brexit class actions climate change contamination data data analysis eco-friendly environment environmental clean up environmental disputes environmental mediation environmental technology EPA farmed fish Flint global water challenge green living infrastructure legal strategy litigation alternative mediation mediation process mediation vs. litigation nature negotation New Jersey pollution oceans protected areas recycling renewable energy role of mediator settlement sustainability technology toxic tort water water contamintation water summit

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial