Logo
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter



This website is authored by Lester Levy, Esq.
a founding member of JAMS.

  • About
    • About Lester Levy
  • The Basics of Environmental Mediation
    • What types of Environmental Cases can be mediated?
    • The Benefits of Environmental Mediation
    • The Environmental Mediation Process
    • Insurance Company Involvement
    • The Mediation Outcome
  • Case Studies
    • Case Study 1: Objectivity as Resolution Tool Provided Through A Neutral Expert
    • Case Study 2: Working Together
    • Case Study 3: Swift, Fair and Efficient: Awarding Compensation to Toxic Tort Victims
    • Case Study 4: Sequenced Regulatory and Insurance Negotiations
    • Case Study 5: How Communication Both Causes and Ends Conflict
  • Blog
  • In the News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Case Studies / Why Early Insurer Participation is Critical

Why Early Insurer Participation is Critical

September 24, 2015 by Lester Levy Leave a Comment

environmental mediation processIn many environmental cases, pre-pollution exclusion policies are invaluable assets that prove absolutely necessary in order to fund case resolution. This is especially where the insured-defendant is no longer in business or has few or no assets available to respond to the environmental cleanup requirement.   But while the insurance coverage may be key to resolving the case, it is not uncommon for there to be an adversarial relationship between the policyholder and its insurance companies, as each is attempting to spend as little as possible of its own money in contribution to the settlement effort.

Needless to say this dynamic can create an impediment to reaching a settlement. What often happens is that policyholders opt to keep their insurers in the dark as much a possible, in an attempt to avoid disclosure of facts and circumstances that could provide the insurers with a basis to deny coverage. There is tension between facts that tend to establish coverage and which may also be harmful to the policyholder in the underlying environmental case.

Traditional litigation often fails to provide an effective way for insurance carriers and the value of their policies to effectively participate or contribute to resolution of the main environmental court proceeding. There may be ancillary lawsuits between various policyholders and their insurers but these are normally stayed pending resolution of liability issues in the environmental case. Even if the insurance coverage cases are not stayed there is no formal – and little informal – coordination between the various cases.

As an alternative to this bifurcated approach, I have been involved in a number of situations where mediation involving all parties, including insurance carriers, is used to facilitate settlement in a parallel track to environmental litigation. Using mediation in this way enables the inclusion of insurance carriers in the settlement process, and provides for compliance with insurance company-specific requirements, which are ordinarily are not directly addressed in the environmental court case.

To some lawyers it may seem inefficient to mediate and litigate in tandem. But in the absence of mediation, settlement negotiations of environmental disputes are often far too haphazard, left to individual lawyer preference, which may be insufficient to bring about a successful outcome. In my experience it proves to be far more inefficient when some or all of the insurers are brought into settlement discussions too late in the process. A complex case mediator anticipates the carriers’ needs so that they are adequately prepared to negotiate at the right time. Attention is also given to the carriers’ needs to coordinate their efforts with other insurers at the same level of a party’s insurance profile, as well as with excess carriers and reinsurers.

As a case in point, in one matter that I recently worked on, a principal defendant had a block of primary, excess and umbrella coverage over many years, issued by multiple insurers. One primary carrier had paid millions of dollars in defense; that carrier ultimately paid an additional $9 million dollars to settle and exhaust its primary policy. The other carriers for that defendant took the position that they had no duty to defend and that their indemnity limits had not been triggered. Periodic mandatory meetings were held with those carriers to educate them on the status of the lawsuit and settlement and to avoid the informational imbalance described above. When necessary, the previously “non-participating” carriers were prepared and able to meaningfully participate in reaching settlement.

The point is this: Bringing insurer representatives into the mediation process as early as possible — even before actual dollar figures are discussed – puts the parties in a stronger position to settle. Separate sessions with all or sub-groups of carrier representative, without policy holder counsel, allows for the airing of issues and the development of pro-settlement strategies.

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: Case Studies Tagged With: environmental mediation, insurer participation, mediation process

inter-generational-theft-Brexit-climate-change

The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change

In last week’s Brexit vote results, there was a tremendous divide between age groups. 73% of voters under the age of 25 voted to remain in the EU, while about 58% over the age of 45 voted to leave. This generational gap is among the many parallels … Read More...

drinking-water-regulation

Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass

WASHINGTON — Federal drinking water rules are so relaxed that not even the city of Flint, Michigan, has been cited for a violation, even though many Flint residents have been relying on bottled water for drinking and cooking since last year. The … Read More...

Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes

Some of you may already have seen a copy of my new ebook, in which I propose a new paradigm for resolving complex, multi-party environmental disputes. It relies on mediation -- not as it has been compromised and incorporated into standard litigation … Read More...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tweets by @environmentadr

Environmental Mediation Newsletter

Sign up to receive my environmental mediation newsletter on a monthly basis

Tags

ADR agriculture alternative dispute resolution Apple Apple phones big data Bio diversity Brexit class actions climate change contamination data data analysis eco-friendly environment environmental clean up environmental disputes environmental mediation environmental technology EPA farmed fish Flint global water challenge green living infrastructure legal strategy litigation alternative mediation mediation process mediation vs. litigation nature negotation New Jersey pollution oceans protected areas recycling renewable energy role of mediator settlement sustainability technology toxic tort water water contamintation water summit

About Me

lester-levy

I strongly believe in the value of mediation – said another way, environmental mediation really works. I would go even further: I believe that environmental disputes are perfectly suited to the mediation process – perhaps more so than any other area of legal practice. I have formed these views after mediating environmental cases for more than 20 years, throughout the United States, and having worked with thousands of lawyers, companies, insurance carriers, regulatory agencies and courts. My … Read more

My Latest Posts

  • The inter-generational theft of Brexit and climate change
  • Our Drinking Water Regulation Is So Weak Even Flint’s Water Got A Pass
  • Environmental Mediation: A New Paradigm for Resolving Multi-Party Disputes
  • Flexibility Is Key to Success in Mediation
  • Leaving the EU would put our environment at risk

Connect with Me

Lester Levy

JAMS- New York
620 Eighth Ave. (NY Times Building)
34th Floor
New York, NY 10018
P (212) 751-2700

JAMS- San Francisco
2 Embarcadero Center
Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94111
P (415) 982-5267

Copyright 2016-2020 Lester Levy | Site developed by Good2bSocial